Sampling initially came from analog to digital signal conversion. Igor UA3DJY, the JTDX author has tried to explain further: So to answer your question, if you prefer WSJTx then I think that is fine, stay with it.ĭespite clarification, there is still some mis-understandings being aired on Facebook. Therefore the UMA addition giving JTDX 32 bit info is, as always, just to provide as complete a picture of what is available to EE product owners and should not be taken as any endorsement on my part. As for 32bit, so far only theoretical data has been published but it shows a strong liklihood of more completed QSOs when a band is saturated with signals and the radio, like ours, can take advantage of the increased sampling. JTDX is a clear winner even at the previous 16bit versions. The JTDX author and a small team of testers run the tests and publish decoding comparison tables - the number of decodes per period on average. Hello Jean-Marie, I have to say that I prefer JTDX but I have no data of my own in respect of comparisons with WSJTx.

Virtual audio cable 4.15 full